On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 01:39:40PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:05:18 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:


Reinhard, let's do the next upload with 4:0.6-1~ and be done with it.

I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for this. If you want to change it, go ahead.

<nitpicking>

I suggest to then state in changelog that it is loosened, not tightened, as I believe most users expect the technical aspect when reading such notes.

</nitpicking>


- What does "make debian/patches gbp-pq friendly" actually mean?

I was playing with gbp-pq import and gbp-pq export, and it seems to enforce it's own scheme of naming patches.

Unfortunatly, it doesn't seem to work out too well for me so far :-(

I would expect gbp-pq to overwrite existing patch series file, and thus not play nice with any patches added through different methods. Interesting if it can actually play nice with other routines.

(as might be obvious from above, I have not yet tried gbp-pq myself).


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to