On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 23:16:52 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:08, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 17:44:03 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:14, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com>
>>>> Am 29.06.2010 13:39, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>>>>> I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for
>>>>> this. If you want to change it, go ahead.
>>>> I'll change it, just to make sure...
>>> If the objective is to use at least the released version (and not a
>>> svn snapshot), I think the correct approach would be to use 4:0.6.0~,
>>> and not include the debian revision. This, however, would mean
>>> changing the version from 4:0.6-1 to 4:0.6.0-1
>> this looks wrong to me.
>> what's the problem with 4:0.6~?
> That you intended to restrict the dependencies to the first upstream
> 0.6 released package, but you actually loosened to any previous svn
> checkout of the 0.6 branch.
oh, I see. Indeed. In that case, Fabian is right with 4:0.6-1~
This of course looses against 4:0.6-0ubuntu1, but that's hardly a
problem that we need to consider here anyway.
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list