On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 13:05:18 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:

> Am 29.06.2010 12:38, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>> Hmm, just curious (I won't waste time on discussing further): is it
>> tightening by some other aspect than technical?
> It's philosophical, but by removing the svn revision, which points to a
> date a few weeks before the release, from the version number you
> actually get "closer" to the release.


> Reinhard, let's do the next upload with 4:0.6-1~ and be done with it.

I don't have a strong opinion here, but I feel 4:0.6~ is good enough for
this. If you want to change it, go ahead.

> BTW, I've got to other questions:
> - Shouldn't we upload another revision of rtmpdump ASAP with librtmp-dev
> depending on libgnutls-dev and remove this build-depends from ffmpeg?

uploading rtmpdump now sounds good, reuploading ffmpeg doesn't seem
important enough to me.

> - What does "make debian/patches gbp-pq friendly" actually mean?

I was playing with gbp-pq import and gbp-pq export, and it seems to
enforce it's own scheme of naming patches.

Unfortunatly, it doesn't seem to work out too well for me so far :-(

Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to