On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:29:23 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > > There are (at least) three missing package relationships: > > > libgphoto2-dev Breaks: libgphoto2-2-dev > > libgphoto2-dev-doc Breaks: libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-3) > > libgphoto2-doc Breaks: libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-3) > > Sorry for following up 10 times, but I am a little bit slow yet. The > -doc packages will need a replaces, too.
I already did that... http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-phototools/libgphoto2.git;a=commitdiff;h=4b69e2bb614ac7d0ef752ffa3b0a1a39fdc08aca (btw, does anyone know how to show the "master" branch by default there, instead of "unstable"?) > On a sidenote, should there really be *two* doc packages? > libgphoto2-doc is just 150 kB. (REJECT-FAQ says "The point there is > *big*.") Since the package is still NEW, it hasn't been published at all, so I could just revert the libgphoto2-doc split with no extra effort. I admit I was misguided by lintian's I: libgphoto2-2: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2562kB 59% Now that I look better, it's the locales. Based on that, this is what I'll do now: - revert the libgphoto2-doc split - make a libgphoto2-l10n, Arch:all, containing locales, Recommended by libgphoto2-2. This way it'll be pulled in by default, but we could make it a dependency as well (even if I'd be for recommends) In the meanwhile, I'll ask for the package to be REJECTed. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
