On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:04:52 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:

> David Paleino <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:02:15 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> 
> >> (new) libgphoto2-dev-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc
> >> (new) libgphoto2-dev_2.4.10.1-4_i386.deb optional libdevel
> >> (new) libgphoto2-doc_2.4.10.1-4_all.deb optional doc
> 
> > Just for clarification, these are the NEW packages. The old libgphoto2-2-dev
> > has been renamed to libgphoto2-dev, to ease transitions in case of a SONAME
> > bump.
> [...]
> 
> There are (at least) three missing package relationships:
> 
> libgphoto2-dev          Breaks: libgphoto2-2-dev
> libgphoto2-dev-doc      Breaks: libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-3)
> libgphoto2-doc          Breaks: libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-3)

Ow, right. I missed them.

(I tested the upgrade with "dpkg -i", and everything went fine.. sigh.)

I'm making a new revision.

Thanks,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel

Reply via email to