---Reply to mail from Alexander R. Pruss about progress on joining fragments
> Is there anything wrong with a simple continuation bit/byte? It does the
> job and there is already a viewer that supports it, Tim Wentworth's Zaurus
> viewer?
I can't find a problem with it. Older viewers would simply ignore it
and older parsers would always set it to '0'. We're still fully
backward-compatible.
I'm thinking that if we do need a 'mapping' (for next/prev) sometime,
it could be a new record type with a 'base' record in th 1-10 range.
Similar to the URL records.
I say 'Go Ahead' sounds goooood!!
---End reply
Christopher R. Hawks
HAWKSoft
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Sleep is for wimps. Happy, healthy, well-rested wimps, but wimps
nonetheless"
-- Gary "Wolf" Barnes, in alt.sysadmin.recovery
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
