At 08:39 AM 3/29/00 +0800, Orlando Andico wrote:
>I can see brianb rising to the bait! :)
You could say I was fishing for his reply :) I only learned of AOLserver
when I visited his web site after I attended his Linux 99 sessions.
>I think its performance is very high, AOL uses it. But note that on Linux
>Apache is performance-limited by the OS, not intrinsically by itself. The
>khttpd in Linux 2.3 is supposed to get around that, at least for
>byte-serving flat files.
Thanks for that bit of info. I find it a bit ironic that Apache is
performance-limited by Linux.
For dynamic pages with database access on Linux, do you think Apache with
FastCGI compares well with AOLserver? I really am a newbie to all of this
so any bit of info/speculation/tips would help a lot.
Thanks,
Rey
-
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
