x32 kernels can use KVM. You mean Ubuntu x32 kernels can not?

   Ed   <Yarrrr>     http://blog.eonsec.com/
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Miguel Paraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Dido... GMail mobile sent this direct to you!
>
>  Anyway, Ubuntu 7.10 x64 (strictly speaking, amd64) is a success! I
>  just had to use the "alternate" install for a text mode install - my
>  first time. This was because the regular installer had no video
>  output.
>
>  The installer did not detect the "atl1" network chipset on the Asus,
>  but upon boot all was well.
>
>  Next up... the reason I chose x64... kvm.
>
>  On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Miguel Paraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I got the palit geforce 8600 gt sonic, which is less than php4k. I'm
>  >  not willing to spend more than that for video! But i found out that it
>  >  doesn't work with the stock ubuntu installer. I need to download the
>  >  alternate installer. The card driver an acer p223w at 1680x1050,
>  >
>  >  i got the e8200 for vt and since it's a penryn. This is the lowest end
>  >  now, 2.66 ghz, 6 mb l2, 1333 fsb. Using asus p5kse, an intel p35+ich9
>  >  chipset, and 1 piece of kingston valueram ddr2-800 2gb. No
>  >  overclocking plans anyway. I might even underclock to 2ghz, it's a
>  >  simple bios multiplier setting.
>  >
>  >  will find out, tonight i hope, the linux experience. I'm using hec
>  >  550w psu, and a generic case that i'll probably replace depending on
>  >  the heat profile. Will see if intel did their homework inside!
>
>
> >
>  >
>  >
>  >  On 3/5/08, Rafael Sevilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:47:23 +0800
>  >  > "Miguel Paraz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > > But I can't accept why Intel put VT only in the E6xxx and above, while
>  >  > > AMD made its virtualization feature available on the lowliest X2 3600+
>  >  > > (or even lower?) Maybe because VT only makes sense with 4 MB L2 cache?
>  >  >
>  >  > Oddly enough, my laptop supposedly has an Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 which,
>  >  > according to all online documentation I've come across shouldn't have
>  >  > VT, however, I see this when I cat /proc/cpuinfo:
>  >  >
>  >  > model name    : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU         T5500  @ 1.66GHz
>  >  > ...
>  >  > flags         : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr
>  >  > pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe
>  >  > syscall lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good pni monitor
>  >  > ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
>  >  >        ^^^
>  >  > Note the VMX flag there.  I run KVM just fine and apparently it has no
>  >  > trouble using the virtualization extensions that appear to be
>  >  > very much present on my system.
>  >  >
>  >  > --
>  >  > An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be
>  >  > made in his subject, and how to avoid them.
>  >  > http://stormwyrm.blogspot.com
>  >  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>
> >  Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
>  >
>  _________________________________________________
>
>
> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
>  [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
>  Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
>  Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
>
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to