On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:10 PM, fooler mail <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:17 PM, jan gestre <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I bet btrfs can even top zfs > > i doubt... zfs has rich set of features over btrfs.. even chris mason > founder of btrfs admitted it... > > Q: Several people might be interested what you think about ZFS, why > you see a need for Btrfs "despite of ZFS" (some people think ZFS is > the solution for everything for them). > > Well, the short answer is that for Linux, there is no ZFS. I know > about the FUSE port, but that isn't a long term solution in terms of > performance or enterprise workloads. ZFS has an impressive list of > features (and clearly many happy users), but the real competition for > Btrfs is other Linux filesystems. > > http://liquidat.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/interview-chris-mason-about-btrfs/ > Too many license nowadays which I believe is detrimental to FOSS, I wish GPL could be as lenient as BSD's :D so we can port ZFS to Linux at the kernel level, but that's just me. my 2 cents worth.
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
