On 2/19/09, jan gestre <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:10 PM, fooler mail <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:17 PM, jan gestre <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I bet btrfs can even top zfs > > > > i doubt... zfs has rich set of features over btrfs.. even chris mason > > founder of btrfs admitted it... > > > > Q: Several people might be interested what you think about ZFS, why > > you see a need for Btrfs "despite of ZFS" (some people think ZFS is > > the solution for everything for them). > > > > Well, the short answer is that for Linux, there is no ZFS. I know > > about the FUSE port, but that isn't a long term solution in terms of > > performance or enterprise workloads. ZFS has an impressive list of > > features (and clearly many happy users), but the real competition for > > Btrfs is other Linux filesystems. > > > > > http://liquidat.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/interview-chris-mason-about-btrfs/ > > > > Too many license nowadays which I believe is detrimental to FOSS, I wish GPL > could be as lenient as BSD's :D so we can port ZFS to Linux at the kernel > level, but that's just me.
....Solaris is dead in the mid-range arena..now niching itself into 686 platform and but their contributions in both platforms are always good. _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
