That part I didn't think about. It's easy to be in "violation".

On Fri, Aug 9, 2024, 10:00 Johnathan Mantey <[email protected]> wrote:

> There's also the danger that "insert provider here" decides you have
> violated their terms of use and permanently block you from your own
> content.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 9:17 AM Ben Koenig <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Obligatory XKCD 743:
> > https://xkcd.com/743
> >
> > A lot of people use "privacy" as a shorthand way to reference the larger
> > issue of trust when it comes to companies like Google.
> >
> > Yes, GW does provide a lot of features that may fall perfectly in line
> > with what users want. But there is more to infrastructure than just "does
> > it have feature X?"
> >
> > Google in general has shown that it is not reliable from an
> infrastructure
> > standpoint. They have a tendency to kill projects, and those projects
> that
> > are not killed will someday change and end users often have no say in the
> > matter. The fact that GW provides the requested features today is moot,
> > because tomorrow those features could be removed or changed rendering
> your
> > conclusion incorrect.
> >
> > Rational people generally avoid Google because they trusted them in the
> > past, got burned and learned from the experience. IIRC there was a
> > discussion very similar to this on G+.... let me get you a link... ;)
> >
> > -Ben
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, August 8th, 2024 at 8:49 AM, mo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Not really.
> > >
> > > Privacy? Considering the insane amount everyone puts on social media,
> > what
> > > privacy is there? Plus anything other self hosted = someone has your
> > data.
> > >
> > > Market diversity? Idk what that one means precisely.
> > >
> > > GW not Gmail. So not free.
> > >
> > > 144% for 1000% more services than mere email host.
> > >
> > > So nope, don't understand even slightly why rational ppl would not
> choose
> > > GW in this scenario. But I appreciate the effort regardless.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024, 07:29 Tomas Kuchta [email protected]
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Privacy, market diversity, not having all eggs in one basket, gmail
> is
> > free
> > > > anyway, .... and 12*6=72 that happens to be 144% of 50
> > > >
> > > > I hope that gives you some idea what others may or may not think
> about
> > when
> > > > chosing a service provider.
> > > >
> > > > Tomas
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 11:36 mo [email protected] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > If $50/yr, why not just use Google Workspace? $6/mo for all their
> > > > > services.
> > > > > I'm asking bc I want the cons of using GW.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 01:18 Tomas Kuchta
> [email protected]
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > ++ for fastmail email hosting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Works great with(out) own domain for $50 per year.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The only feature I am missing - their calendar foes not export
> > birthday
> > > > > > calendar over IMAP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -T
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 16:13 Courtney Rosenthal [email protected]
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah, been there, done that.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When I quit email self-hosting I went to fastmail.com. It
> works
> > out
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > $50 per mailbox per year. I have a bunch of domains there. I
> > setup
> > > > > > > aliases in those domains that forward into one of two
> mailboxes.
> > So
> > > > > > > it's
> > > > > > > costing me about $100/yr for that and I'm super satisfied.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > They won't do DNS though. I'm using cloudns.net and I'm very
> > > > > > > satisfied
> > > > > > > with them. I've had to use their support a few times (for their
> > > > > > > monitoring service) and they've been super responsive --
> > including
> > > > > > > implementing a feature request I made.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/6/24 14:34, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm winding down my self-hosted web space. Part of this is
> > finding
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > place to host jamhome.us - or more accurately the email
> > portion.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Can you recommend a place that would do that? They can host
> the
> > > > > > > > domain
> > > > > > > > name too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Courtney Rosenthal / [email protected] / www.crosenthal.com
> >
>

Reply via email to