Quoting Andre M. V. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Rick Moen wrote:
> hmm... sun does for support. They still have big customers like the US > Navy^H^H^H^H^H^H^H top100 fortune companies. Regardless of whether Sun is still doling out its reserve stock of antique drives, this remains irrelevant to the point: You're comparing a 1984 design with a 2002 design. Don't you feel a little foolish doing that? >> Separately from that, SCSI-3 _did_ not specify a maximum transfer rate, >> and those proceeded forward independently starting around 1995, with >> or without any of the SCSI-3 protocol proposals. > > That is why i don't dare compare SCSI-3 to current IDE drives. > SCSI wins. Again you're missing the point completely: SCSI-3 had _nothing to do_ with maximum transfer rates. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
