> > No you didn't??? You just said I contradicted myself for saying > > that GPL is extremely viral ostensibly because MPL happens to > > be "classic copyleft". I NEVER said copyleft was the reason GPL > > was viral. > > Explain to me, please, how the GNU GPL could be considered "viral" other > than through its copyleft mechanism. Thanks.
This was in my previous message. http://www.croftsoft.com/library/tutorials/gplmpl/ "The MPL avoids the three problems associated with the 'viral' nature of GPL in that it: 1. allows for the combination of MPL code with other code in a larger work without requiring that all code in the entire work be distributed under the same license;" _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
