Quoting Andy Sy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Completely untrue. You've been ignoring what I've been saying all along. > Not the code, but the _rights granted by the license_ are only obtainable > by paying money.
Hah, _who's_ playing games, here? Since you can't get a copy of my GPLed one-liner shell script without forking over that US $1 (because I won't issue it at all except to you, and only upon receipt of US $1), you can't have any aspect at all of the code without paying. Ergo, "commercial licence", according to your (entirely meaningless) rules. Moreover, after any GPL product _has_ been distributed, it can be wrapped up in retail boxed sets with services, contract, and enhancements at whatever price the composite product will command. Which is commerce. > You view the term 'commercial license' only in terms of 'license to > engage in commerce'... _NO._ For the last time, it's a _meaningless concept_. We're done. Reply-To has been set. -- Cheers, "Why is the alphabet in that order? Is it because of that song?" Rick Moen -- Steven Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Searchable Archives With Friendly Web Interface at http://marc.free.net.ph To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
