On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 10:54:52AM +0800, optimus wrote: > A local vendor here in my place once scared customers that buying Red Hat > demands strict license compliance, or else face a humiliating general audit. > I then thought it was FUD, but now I think it's indeed true.
Apparently its only our brain-dead local Red Hat distributors that don't get it. Is there any representative from Touch Solutions on this list listening to what we're saying? I've never heard of any "licensing fees" demanded for any Red Hat distribution anywhere else but here. If this were a general policy of Red Hat, it would be all over Slashdot by now, and the company subject to the ridicule it would so richly deserve. Red Hat's business model has always been about providing support, and that's what you get when you pay US$2.5k a year per deployment. If you don't want it, nothing forces you to pay it, naturally. -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
