On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Lonnie Olson <[email protected]> wrote: > I personally doubt that anyone suspecting getting caught for child > pornography would care about keeping their hardware functional.
But does this fact justify the use of deadly force when serving a warrant on someone suspected of downloading child porn? It seems to me that destruction of one's own hard drive at the first sign of police, combined with evidence that child pornography had been downloaded to their location, would be enough to convict - regardless of whether you recovered any actual porn. /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
