AlecSp wrote: > OK, so injudicious with my words, I realise. > > For completeness: > On my Pi4B with library on a USB 3 memory stick directly connected, a > full scan takes 10:02, Look for new and changed files takes 00:52 > On my Pi3B+ with library on a NAS, a full scan took just under 60 mins, > Look for new and changed files took just over 10 mins. > > Still a bit of an apples and pears comparison, as the storage is > different. I did try the USB drive on the Pi 3B+, but it wasn't a > massive improvement, as I was limited by the USB 2 speeds. Going for > the Pi4B gave me the killer benefit of being much faster and allowing me > to use a faster local drive. > > Either way, I still stand by the Pi4B being the model to go for (until > future changes). The price difference is tiny, but the performance > gains can be massive.I agree. I used a Pi3B before I got my Pi4 and the > scanning speed is much faster. Transferring files over the network is also faster to a USB3 drive.
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ slartibartfast's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35609 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=113479 _______________________________________________ plugins mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/plugins
