On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:18:03PM -0400, sungo wrote: > Perhaps I'm misreading... What I'm hearing is "you should change this > for me, regardless of whether it breaks other people's code". Is that an > accurate summary?
No. That was in response to expanding ClientArgs into ARG0..$#_. I'm suggesting if compatibility is going to be broken, it should be broken to fit the documentation, and to be useful. -- Michael Fowler www.shoebox.net
