On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:56:15PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:30:26PM +0100, steven mestdagh said that > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:00:44PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > > > hi there, > > > > > > i have upgraded my production server to 3.8 release. > > > i have no X there, but as in my previous post about the new > > > rrdtools i sense some shift in what actually no_x11 means > > > or will mean in the future. > > > > > > please note that i am describing a 3.8 release situation, > > > if this is fixed in current, disregard it. > > > > > > first of all here's the log of installing tetex no_x11: > > > > > > integer> sudo pkg_add teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11 > > > teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:png-1.2.8: complete > > > teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:t1lib-5.0.0: complete > > > teTeX_base-3.0p1-no_x11:ghostscript-fonts-6.0: complete > > > Can't install ghostscript-7.05p6: lib not found ICE.8.0 > > > Even by looking in the dependency tree: > > > ghostscript-fonts-6.0, png-1.2.8 > > > > this has been fixed in -current, see cvs logs. > > > > > could this be fixed for 3.8 release? > > > > no, only security/reliability issues are fixed in -stable. > > you can try to backport the fixes from current, if you really need this. > > isn't this reliability?
has your system become less reliable due to this? i think not. there is simply no time to fix all little port mistakes in the -stable trees. > it's not the problem of the actual software but the port. > > and 3.8 will be supported for 12 months from now on.... uhu, and in about 5 months, there will be 3.9 with the fix included. -- steven Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
