Landry Breuil writes: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:01:33PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > > Philip Guenther, 18 Nov 2014 12:42: > > > Executive summary: delete the procmail port; the code is not safe and > > > should not be used as a basis for any further work. > > > > just for the record, what is the alternative > > you would recommend? > > fdm, what else ?
After Philip's email I switched to fdm. It turns out to be well documented, nicely licensed, and easy to set up as a replacement for getmail/procmail (which I was using previously). -- Anthony J. Bentley
