Are the packet-in messages and their payloads 100% identical?
Are you doing this on real hardware, or in Mininet, or... ?
-- Murphy
On May 22, 2014, at 11:13 PM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi murphy
> i have a path between two hosts(h1 and h2) in a data center,when i ping h2
> from h1 since switches on this path have no flow entry for route icmp packet
> to h2 , the edge switch that h1 connected to it(e_s1) ,send icmp packet to
> controller. in controller i handle it and i add flow entry to each switch on
> this path in my controller code and at last send packet out msg to e_s1 to
> forward this packet. during this action (ping h2 from h1) i capture traffic
> of my network by wireshark and i see packet in msg from e_s1 two times sends
> to controller that i expect packet in msg must send once.
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Murphy McCauley <murphy.mccau...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> I think you'll need to provide a lot more detail.
>
> Are you saying that you're trying to proactively insert all the rules into
> the switch when it connects, but you're getting packet-ins (from table
> misses) anyway and you're not expecting them?
>
> How do packet-outs factor in here?
>
> -- Murphy
>
> On May 22, 2014, at 5:45 AM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> i must say that i use 1.add flow message and 2.packet out message
>> sequensialy
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> hi all
>>
>> i have a fat-tree topology, when i ping a host from another host i found
>> that first host 2 times send packet in message to controller and i dont know
>> why. can anybody help me ?
>>
>> P.S i use core.openflow.addListenerByName("ConnectionUp", start_switch)
>> for event handling.
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Farshad Tajedin
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Farshad Tajedin
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Farshad Tajedin
