P.S
when i remove last line every thing is ok
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:17 PM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> sorry this hase better view
>
> -core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[1]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[2]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
>
> -core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0001'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[2]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[3]/(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
>
> -core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[3]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[4]%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
>
> -core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0003'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[4]),16),self.add_FlowEntri(((int(dstNo)-1)%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
>
>
> -self.connection.send(self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
> -self.connection.send(self.packetOutMsg((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,of.buffer_id,of.data))
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:16 PM, farshad tajedin <
> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> this my code section which make this problem:
>>
>>
>> core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[1]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[2]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>>
>> core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0001'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[2]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[3]/(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>>
>> core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[3]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[4]%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>>
>> core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0003'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[4]),16),self.add_FlowEntri(((int(dstNo)-1)%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>>
>>
>>
>> self.connection.send(self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>>
>> self.connection.send(self.packetOutMsg((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,of.buffer_id,of.data))
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:44 AM, farshad tajedin <
>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> yes of curse but not now because i am at my job now and haven't access
>>> to source code, i will do this a few hours later.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Generally speaking, there's only ever one active connection to a switch
>>>> at a time.
>>>>
>>>> Can you share a minimal version of your code which demonstrates the
>>>> issue?
>>>>
>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>
>>>> On May 24, 2014, at 10:20 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> as i said before in my controller code i used two connection to e_s1
>>>> sequentially one for installing flow entry and next connection for sending
>>>> packet out message. if connecting to switches done by thread programming so
>>>> these message sending parallel, is these parallel message to one switch
>>>> make problem?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's implemented by a recoco Task as described in the POX manual.
>>>>> Beneath that, there's a thread, but then... isn't there always?
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 24, 2014, at 4:04 AM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> is connection to switch implemented by thread?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How about disabling enough links in your topology so that it doesn't
>>>>>> have loops and then trying? (I'm wondering if the second one has looped
>>>>>> back to where it started somehow.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another thought would be to wireshark all the ports of the switch
>>>>>> where you're seeing two of these packets. Do you actually see the packet
>>>>>> arrive twice? Leave twice? Etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 23, 2014, at 9:51 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes both of them are same except buffer id , i do this in mininet
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:53 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yes both of them are same except buffer id , i do this in mininet
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are the packet-in messages and their payloads 100% identical?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you doing this on real hardware, or in Mininet, or... ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 11:13 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hi murphy
>>>>>>>> i have a path between two hosts(h1 and h2) in a data center,when i
>>>>>>>> ping h2 from h1 since switches on this path have no flow entry for
>>>>>>>> route
>>>>>>>> icmp packet to h2 , the edge switch that h1 connected to it(e_s1) ,send
>>>>>>>> icmp packet to controller. in controller i handle it and i add flow
>>>>>>>> entry
>>>>>>>> to each switch on this path in my controller code and at last send
>>>>>>>> packet
>>>>>>>> out msg to e_s1 to forward this packet. during this action (ping h2
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> h1) i capture traffic of my network by wireshark and i see packet in
>>>>>>>> msg
>>>>>>>> from e_s1 two times sends to controller that i expect packet in msg
>>>>>>>> must
>>>>>>>> send once.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>>>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think you'll need to provide a lot more detail.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you saying that you're trying to proactively insert all the
>>>>>>>>> rules into the switch when it connects, but you're getting packet-ins
>>>>>>>>> (from
>>>>>>>>> table misses) anyway and you're not expecting them?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do packet-outs factor in here?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 5:45 AM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i must say that i use 1.add flow message and 2.packet out message
>>>>>>>>> sequensialy
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hi all
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> i have a fat-tree topology, when i ping a host from another host
>>>>>>>>>> i found that first host 2 times send packet in message to controller
>>>>>>>>>> and i
>>>>>>>>>> dont know why. can anybody help me ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> P.S i use core.openflow.addListenerByName("ConnectionUp",
>>>>>>>>>> start_switch) for event handling.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards
>>>>
>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Farshad Tajedin
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Farshad Tajedin
>
--
Best Regards
Farshad Tajedin
