sorry this hase better view
-core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[1]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[2]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
-core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0001'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[2]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[3]/(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
-core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[3]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[4]%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
-core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0003'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[4]),16),self.add_FlowEntri(((int(dstNo)-1)%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
-self.connection.send(self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
-self.connection.send(self.packetOutMsg((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,of.buffer_id,of.data))
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:16 PM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> this my code section which make this problem:
>
>
> core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[1]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[2]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
> core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0001'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[2]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[3]/(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
> core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[3]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[4]%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
> core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0003'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[4]),16),self.add_FlowEntri(((int(dstNo)-1)%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
>
>
> self.connection.send(self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
>
> self.connection.send(self.packetOutMsg((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,of.buffer_id,of.data))
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:44 AM, farshad tajedin <
> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> yes of curse but not now because i am at my job now and haven't access to
>> source code, i will do this a few hours later.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Generally speaking, there's only ever one active connection to a switch
>>> at a time.
>>>
>>> Can you share a minimal version of your code which demonstrates the
>>> issue?
>>>
>>> -- Murphy
>>>
>>> On May 24, 2014, at 10:20 PM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> as i said before in my controller code i used two connection to e_s1
>>> sequentially one for installing flow entry and next connection for sending
>>> packet out message. if connecting to switches done by thread programming so
>>> these message sending parallel, is these parallel message to one switch
>>> make problem?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's implemented by a recoco Task as described in the POX manual.
>>>> Beneath that, there's a thread, but then... isn't there always?
>>>>
>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>
>>>> On May 24, 2014, at 4:04 AM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> is connection to switch implemented by thread?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How about disabling enough links in your topology so that it doesn't
>>>>> have loops and then trying? (I'm wondering if the second one has looped
>>>>> back to where it started somehow.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Another thought would be to wireshark all the ports of the switch
>>>>> where you're seeing two of these packets. Do you actually see the packet
>>>>> arrive twice? Leave twice? Etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 23, 2014, at 9:51 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> yes both of them are same except buffer id , i do this in mininet
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:53 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> yes both of them are same except buffer id , i do this in mininet
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are the packet-in messages and their payloads 100% identical?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you doing this on real hardware, or in Mininet, or... ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 11:13 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> hi murphy
>>>>>>> i have a path between two hosts(h1 and h2) in a data center,when i
>>>>>>> ping h2 from h1 since switches on this path have no flow entry for route
>>>>>>> icmp packet to h2 , the edge switch that h1 connected to it(e_s1) ,send
>>>>>>> icmp packet to controller. in controller i handle it and i add flow
>>>>>>> entry
>>>>>>> to each switch on this path in my controller code and at last send
>>>>>>> packet
>>>>>>> out msg to e_s1 to forward this packet. during this action (ping h2
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> h1) i capture traffic of my network by wireshark and i see packet in msg
>>>>>>> from e_s1 two times sends to controller that i expect packet in msg must
>>>>>>> send once.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think you'll need to provide a lot more detail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you saying that you're trying to proactively insert all the
>>>>>>>> rules into the switch when it connects, but you're getting packet-ins
>>>>>>>> (from
>>>>>>>> table misses) anyway and you're not expecting them?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do packet-outs factor in here?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 5:45 AM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i must say that i use 1.add flow message and 2.packet out message
>>>>>>>> sequensialy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> hi all
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i have a fat-tree topology, when i ping a host from another host i
>>>>>>>>> found that first host 2 times send packet in message to controller
>>>>>>>>> and i
>>>>>>>>> dont know why. can anybody help me ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> P.S i use core.openflow.addListenerByName("ConnectionUp",
>>>>>>>>> start_switch) for event handling.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards
>>>>
>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Farshad Tajedin
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Farshad Tajedin
>
--
Best Regards
Farshad Tajedin
