this my code section which make this problem:
core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[1]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[2]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0001'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[2]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[3]/(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0002'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[3]),16),self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[4]%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
core.openflow.sendToDPID(int('0003'+self.ToDPIDformat(SelectOne[4]),16),self.add_FlowEntri(((int(dstNo)-1)%(NumOfPod/2))+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
self.connection.send(self.add_FlowEntri((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,str(dstIP),0x800))
self.connection.send(self.packetOutMsg((SelectOne[1]%(NumOfPod/2))+(NumOfPod/2)+1,of.buffer_id,of.data))
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:44 AM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> yes of curse but not now because i am at my job now and haven't access to
> source code, i will do this a few hours later.
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Murphy McCauley <
> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Generally speaking, there's only ever one active connection to a switch
>> at a time.
>>
>> Can you share a minimal version of your code which demonstrates the issue?
>>
>> -- Murphy
>>
>> On May 24, 2014, at 10:20 PM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> as i said before in my controller code i used two connection to e_s1
>> sequentially one for installing flow entry and next connection for sending
>> packet out message. if connecting to switches done by thread programming so
>> these message sending parallel, is these parallel message to one switch
>> make problem?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's implemented by a recoco Task as described in the POX manual.
>>> Beneath that, there's a thread, but then... isn't there always?
>>>
>>> -- Murphy
>>>
>>> On May 24, 2014, at 4:04 AM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> is connection to switch implemented by thread?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How about disabling enough links in your topology so that it doesn't
>>>> have loops and then trying? (I'm wondering if the second one has looped
>>>> back to where it started somehow.)
>>>>
>>>> Another thought would be to wireshark all the ports of the switch where
>>>> you're seeing two of these packets. Do you actually see the packet arrive
>>>> twice? Leave twice? Etc.
>>>>
>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>
>>>> On May 23, 2014, at 9:51 PM, farshad tajedin <farshad.taje...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> yes both of them are same except buffer id , i do this in mininet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:53 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> yes both of them are same except buffer id , i do this in mininet
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are the packet-in messages and their payloads 100% identical?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you doing this on real hardware, or in Mininet, or... ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 11:13 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hi murphy
>>>>>> i have a path between two hosts(h1 and h2) in a data center,when i
>>>>>> ping h2 from h1 since switches on this path have no flow entry for route
>>>>>> icmp packet to h2 , the edge switch that h1 connected to it(e_s1) ,send
>>>>>> icmp packet to controller. in controller i handle it and i add flow entry
>>>>>> to each switch on this path in my controller code and at last send packet
>>>>>> out msg to e_s1 to forward this packet. during this action (ping h2 from
>>>>>> h1) i capture traffic of my network by wireshark and i see packet in msg
>>>>>> from e_s1 two times sends to controller that i expect packet in msg must
>>>>>> send once.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Murphy McCauley <
>>>>>> murphy.mccau...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think you'll need to provide a lot more detail.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you saying that you're trying to proactively insert all the
>>>>>>> rules into the switch when it connects, but you're getting packet-ins
>>>>>>> (from
>>>>>>> table misses) anyway and you're not expecting them?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do packet-outs factor in here?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Murphy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 22, 2014, at 5:45 AM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i must say that i use 1.add flow message and 2.packet out message
>>>>>>> sequensialy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, farshad tajedin <
>>>>>>> farshad.taje...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hi all
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i have a fat-tree topology, when i ping a host from another host i
>>>>>>>> found that first host 2 times send packet in message to controller and
>>>>>>>> i
>>>>>>>> dont know why. can anybody help me ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.S i use core.openflow.addListenerByName("ConnectionUp",
>>>>>>>> start_switch) for event handling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards
>>>>
>>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Farshad Tajedin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Farshad Tajedin
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Farshad Tajedin
>
--
Best Regards
Farshad Tajedin
