afs commented on PR #2501: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/2501#issuecomment-2145134492
> Is new SPARQL syntax really required for this? IMO that is a major drawback. Couldn't extension functions suffice? As a GeoSPARQL-like approach? I think @SimonBin's work shows that it can be done. While it may be possible within existing syntax, this area is fundamental and IMO would benefit with syntax. It is not an a call-out extension like text query, geo or LLM's. though extensions call-out needs something more agreed than property functions or use of `SERVICE`. The SPARQL standard needs a multi-bind. At the moment, the optimizer needs to make them special cases. We do have to be clear that this syntax proposal, and the future SEP, are evolving (as is `LATERAL`) and subject to change. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@jena.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@jena.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: pr-h...@jena.apache.org
