afs commented on PR #2501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/2501#issuecomment-2145865799

   > > It is not an a call-out extension like text query, geo
   
   
   > Precisely because the GeoSPARQL 1.1/1.2 aggregate functions would also 
greatly benefit from being able to ORDER BY and UNFOLD in certain ways, I 
believe we should take some extra thought while designing the final version of 
this SEP
   
   Yes - the general case of SPARQL would benefit. 
   
   That was a response to "Is new SPARQL syntax really required for this? IMO 
that is a major drawback. Couldn't extension functions suffice?".
   
   Property functions aren't very intuitive as the arguments become more 
complex (c.f. the alternative of use of SERVICE)
   
   I would suggest that a proposal be developed - which can be a Jena change if 
having a concrete implementation that community can engage with.  We just have 
to be clear what is experimental/subject to change and what is stable.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@jena.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: pr-unsubscr...@jena.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: pr-h...@jena.apache.org

Reply via email to