> On 18/1/03 16:38, Shangara Singh wrote: > >> At the moment, I only foresee myself printing "pure" black and white. Just >> wondering if both inks provide the same "neutral" prints or does one provide >> better or greater tonal range than the other, all things being equal? >
> > Although I have had no experience with QB, I understand that they shift > quite wildly under different light sources compared to SG's. I use the > latter quite extensively on an 1160 profiled by Thomas and beautiful results > can be achieved. They do take a little getting used to though... Shangara, Just to back up Jack's comment, I recently switched from SG to QB inks for one job as I'd run out of the former, and only had the latter to hand. Big mistake! The metamerism is shocking. Under tungsten lighting they looked bright magenta! The prints also bore no relation to what was on screen - being far too light. Simon. =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
