on 2/19/03 12:57 PM, Paul Tansley wrote: > Now I'm not complaining here, but it does beg the question - When is version > 8 of Photoshop due?
> It > would therefore seem a little bit of a waste of money to spend $99 on it at > the present time? Even if I knew, I couldn't tell you but you can do the math (the number of months between versions over the years has been pretty consistent give or take. But the bigger issues is, who cares? The product is wonderful. It's fast, easy to use, produces wonderful quality and pretty much eliminates the need for building custom profiles for your camera. And if you are a pro, the cost ($99, a screaming deal) will pay for itself the first job you use it on. If you're a pro, (reason to be using a pro camera capable of producing a RAW camera file), I'd have to expect you could pay for this plug-in in a few hours. You could buy the PhaseOne solution for $500. I'm not suggesting it's not a very good product too. It is. But $99 for Camera Raw isn't really an issue IMHO. The lack of a demo isn't an issue in my mind (if you don't like it, can you get your money back?). Andrew Rodney =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
