Shangara
although you are apparently agreeing with the main swing of my point
here I have to take issue with one statement.
<14/11/03 10:08 am Shangara Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>Just to pour petrol on a fire: if the file's saved as a JPEG or TIFF out of
>the camera, it'll be in some flavour of sRGB (some cameras now tag ARGB, I
>believe). So, converting it to ARGB 1998 will just saturate the colors and
>"may" even cause posterization when you start editing.
I have NEVER seen an image gain saturation when converted from sRGB to
Adobe RGB. If yuo see that something's wrong. It's just a smaller
amount of colour sitting in a big space.
Asigning ARGB to an sRGB file is a different matter, the colours will
then be more saturated since you are lying to photoshop about the
meaning of the numbers. .
Regards, NeilB. Apple Solutions Expert
colourmanagement.net :: Consulting in Imaging & Colour Management
custom scanner and printer profiles, training on Imacon Scanning
supply Gretag + eyeOne, ColorSoloutions basICColor : Display etc. XRite
www.colourmanagement.net/ :: www.apple.com/uk/creative/neilbarstow/
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
