Bob
each to his own.
are you saying I gave bad advice?
I wrote:
>>What could be the advantage in converting sRGB to Adobe RGB (unless
>>ARGB is, for some valid reason, imposed upon your workflow?).
>
14/11/03 10:14 am Bob Croxford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>Dear Neil
>
>Surely workflow considerations are paramount. How many people handle
>files individually and one at a time?
everyone, you can only open one at a time, Photoshop handles mixed RGB.
Perhaps the photographer needs to convert all his files to the same
workingsdace before sending off in your scenario. In many cases sRGB
will be a better choice.
every workflow is special, I did say it was up to his own requirements.
Adobe RGB is not BETTER, it's often worse.
>There seems to be a general trend
>towards RGB workflows right up to the PDF for print creation stage.
yes
>Isn't this why we are getting more Adobe RGB compliant capture
>software?
perhaps.
and perhaps it's sRGB with an Adobe RGB tee shirt?
>No pre-press person wants liquorice allsorts colour spaces to
>handle on every page.
most prefer to place CMYK.
You should do it your way, plainly it works for you.
Regards, NeilB. Apple Solutions Expert
colourmanagement.net :: Consulting in Imaging & Colour Management
custom scanner and printer profiles, training on Imacon Scanning
supply Gretag + eyeOne, ColorSoloutions basICColor : Display etc. XRite
www.colourmanagement.net/ :: www.apple.com/uk/creative/neilbarstow/
===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
