Ellie Writes: > If I understand DM > correctly, in his 'less is more' comment, it might be better for me > to send the files through at 200 dpi instead.
Thomas replies: >> While I'm very impressed with Dan's abilities for >> colour correction images that appears to be beyond salvage (well beyond my >> own abilities even after taking his course) this claim is cross to my >> experiences with inkjets, and my experience in this area is substantial. >> It would take a serious deficiency in the printers interpolation engine to >> display this problem. To set the record straight - The section of the PDF is from the printed book - which shows what Dan is talking, where in the case of say grass - the lower res looks sharper or more detailed or more grassy - while the higher res file has a more smooth appearance and the detail of the grass is not as apparent (it's all about statistics). This was in relation to HALFTONE output on a PRINTING PRESS with an image of two different resolutions but at the same physical size and not inkjet output and stochastic screens. Not to say that the same may not apply on inkjets - but there are the differences of how inkjets may cause artifacts at a certain resolution where they may not on a press at that figure. Regards, Stephen Marsh. =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
