I am responding to a few different posts in this thread in one mail -

Richard Lewisohn wrote:

> I would have thought that a more relevant 'real world' test would be to
> see if it is better to 'upres'...

Thomas Holm replies:

>> It depends on what you are testing. I would still start with the vector
approach and find the optimal printer resolution (optimal being lowest
possible with results comparable to higher res). <<

Agreed - this is what my post was referring to.

Rasterizing vector data to mixed resolutions of the test PPI at the same
output size seems to be the best way to me. But one will need to keep in
mind that image content plays a big role, even if one finds the magic
number. Different output processes may all have different rules and issues
that one may need to explore if after hard answers.

======

Jorge Parra writes:

>> (snipped)...At least that is my current understanding on this subject.
Please enhance or
correct me if this is wrong. <<

My comments were in relation to general testing methodology and what is
taking place behind the scenes with the pixel data before output - which
will have a big bearing on the results. As you mention, there are a host of
inkjet related issues as well.

My post and the original that spawned this thread - have more of a bearing
in prepress/press and halftones and lineart with film or CTP (my
background) - although there is obviously some overlap among these output
mediums in issues and results.

>> Effectively, all these tests can only provide a subjective approach to
what
is best FOR EACH OF US, but again, that is one of the beauties of Digital,
the ability of having all of us using the same machines but obtaining
altogether different results <<

My point was that one may mislead themself due to the testing method if not
careful.

This is why rasterizing a vector file overcomes so many variables in the
file prep.


Regards to all involved in this thread,

Stephen Marsh.

===============================================================
GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to