I think that Keith's comment rounds this thread off nicely, Sure we could all turn up and shoot something respectable with a half decent digital compact, but the clients would look at the gear and say "I've got one of those, therefore I can get the same results". Conversely if you turn up with two pro bodies and a few grands worth of glass they feel intimidated and assume that the reason they can't do what we do is because we have better equipment. Unless we are prepared to workshop with our clients and in some way demonstrate the difference between being a photographer and having an expensive camera, I stand by the comment that Bob pulled me up on...."The only thing that marks us 'pro' smudgers out from punters with digital compacts is the price and complexity of our toys". That isn't true, but that's what a lot of people think and changing that would be a Herculean task.

I once met a 'friend of a friend' whose only job seemed to be drinking champagne and crashing Porsches (probably the best thing to do with a Porsche). After quizzing me about what gear I used he went out an bought a 1D, safe in the knowledge that it would enable him to be the next Henri Cartier-Bresson. After filling a micro drive with crap he apparently flogged it at a loss to a local press snapper who doubtlessly got a lot of profitable use out of it at a bargain price.

Calvers


On 1 Apr 2004, at 22:13, Keith Cooper wrote:
That said, I do shamelessly play the "big bag of equipment" card with -some-
clients - it's unfortunate, but if I turned up with a small silver box it
may not be appreciated. Hopefully on subsequent visits the previous results
will have spoken for themselves. We may not like it, but it is part of the
'business'

=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE

Reply via email to