Thank you for your reply, Martin: Martin Wood wrote:
> The DCS is for far higher end uses than Dick thinks. It should be equated > at least on a par with 400 iso 120 film and more like getting on for 160! Thank you for an honest opinion, but this is what I had feared � I am looking for something more equivalent to my Sinar 5*4 than my Hasselblads, even with Velvia/Provia � when I started using medium format, I immediately gave up 400 asa film, as I thought that it was no better than pan f on 35mm. > DSLRs are the reason why Kodak have pulled away from the MF back market. > Yes there are differences but many photographers now realise that there is > now not �7000 difference! A Sinar 54H system is more than 7* more rather than �7k more, and, even with PhotoShop, people buy them� as much for focus control as perspective control. � but, using that Russian program (for micro photography) someone mentioned a while back, you can now use software to give you as much DOF as you need! >> I would feel I would have to cover up the word "Kodak� I realise that Skodas are better than their reputation, and I nearly bought one for my step-daughter... and I do own a Kodak Aero-Ektar 600mm f6 lens! =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
