Moggy I must confess that I was as anti digital capture as you ,so I did lots and lots of tests and convinced myself film was better I even bought a imacon scanner ,then one of my clients said if I do not work digitally then they would have to go elsewhere ,so after even more tests I have a phase one H20 with a sliding back .
I hate to admit it but from a point of work flow and output the digital is so much better , ah I hear you say film is still best I will not compromise ,well I am afraid that that is utter nonsense ,I am just shooting one of the biggest press campaigns in the uk this year and guess what the agency wanted ,yup digital files , they understand that more work can be done and we can send the client immediate updates as the work progresses and what is approved is exactly what will be reproduced in their ads . In fact in this case I strongly suspect that were I not able to work digitally then the job would have gone else ware In fact since starting to shoot digital I would estimate that 80% of all my work has been shot on digital and the other 20% has been 10/8 film and to be fair there is a difference when you get the trannie back but once it is scanned and printed I am dammed if I can tell . So what I suggest is you go and test the digital stuff properly learn how to use it and then you might discover that not only do your costs go down but for reasons I do not quite understand your workload will increase Alun >> >> >> =============================================================== >> GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS >> for SALE >> > > =============================================================== > GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE > =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
