Not sure why everyone is being so 'negative' about this concept.
It seems to be an answer to lots of issues people have been having with the RAW format, especially - what will happen to my files if a manufacturer decides to stop making their RAW converter.
Adobe have the weight to unify everyone behind this shift - whereas other companies probably don't.
This was interesting on the Adobe Message Boards (registration required) <http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx?13@@.3bb615f2/4>
regards
Richard Earney
-- http://www.method-photo.co.uk
On 29 Sep 2004, at 7:26, Martin Orpen wrote:
on 27/9/04 10:01 pm, Bertho wrote:
What Adobe presumably has done, and have the weight behind it to do, is to
create a standard format that all companies can reshuffle the data and drop
it into that pre-defined structure.
I'm presuming that Adobe have just thrown their weight behind hijacking the
TIFF data structure by renaming it DNG.
=============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
