Dominic Burford wrote: Hi Dominic!
Your point is wrong, the criminal will have a gun and he will kill - however you might wish otherwise, but your point is beside the point anyway.
This is *WAY* too important to split hairs about what argument Michael may or may not have been making. The fact is, without guns in the hands of the *non-criminals*, the free world deteriorates exponentially, whether the left can concede it or not.
Of course, it is nothing like that with the left anyway. The left sees the criminals as their foot soldiers, however they may deny this and/or whatever spurious side arguments they may advance.
Regards, Pete
<< The criminals *will* be armed with guns. Naive to expect them not to be. Well duh! That was not the point I was making, and nor was it the point that Michael was making. I was making the point that *if* neither persons was in possession of a gun, then the chances are that *nobody* would have been killed.
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
