On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:14 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/11/2011 4:04 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> I change the security settings depending on the machine server and version >> or workstation. >> >> I didn't get burned on my servers. > > But that's the point--on the workstations, users have set their Windows > Update settings to "NO!" but MS has done updates anyway, deciding that > their interests trump the user's preference. I'd bet that MS has made > damn sure they don't violate that on servers, but we've heard of it > happening on workstations on more than one occasion! ---------------
You don't know to look for the registry hacks yet? All this rule metadata is kept in the registry. Allow me :) <http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=Registry+hack+to+stop+microsoft+update> For some smart people you need to take control of this instead of complain about it like this. Don't get me started on "My customers" You charge them to do the same thing. > And to the poster who said that MS' stuff isn't tested...I don't buy > that. I'm sure that they test a lot before it's released. To not do so > wouldn't make sense for such a huge global company. No one is THAT stupid! ---------------- I did a search and I didn't see anyone complaining about NIC issues on this update. That said wonder what it really was then? Last ting is that if M$ sends out the changes to all vendors to test and THEY DON'T test is it M$ fault? they have hundreds or thousand + support vendors. Should they be held hostage waiting for the last 5% to return any issues? Should they post a list of vendors who fail to test? That would be interesting. -- Stephen Russell Unified Health Services 60 Germantown Court Suite 220 Cordova, TN 38018 Telephone: 888.510.2667 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJwCCFsGs-2=nx_z4eaccl_kcwbxi1vbpvuwdntdja...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
