On Monday 16 October 2006 05:06, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Hi Virgil!
No, I understand the point. What you don't understand is that now that there are computers, they *have* to be used. You can't present research based on twenty cases or even twenty thousand cases, it won't be accepted. You have to have twenty million cases to be taken seriously, perhaps more coming from the alternative side as we are. If we can't do it on the computer, we can't do it. > Pete, you're missing the point entirely.. > > Everything is done on paper first. > Speed is brought into the equation via a computer as is searchability, > analysis, etc... > But you could do all that by hand, it just takes a lot longer... -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
