On 2016-12-01 06:27, Ted Roche wrote:
Agree. Depends on the level of security you want/need. Compiling
encrypted is enough to deter most. Nearly all Fox EXE / DLL can be
decrypted, so if you *really* need it secure, look to a 3rd party
solution, or move the secure parts off the client's machine and
require them to contact a web resource you control so they can't
access it.



I recall somebody mentioning Armadillo to protect your EXEs in the past (from reverse engineering): http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Programming/Registration_Tools/The_Armadillo_Software_Protection_System.html

ReFox also offers protection:  http://www.refox.net/-overview.html

Can you think of any other tool preferable to use for protecting your deployed apps?

Any comments on the two mentioned above?

tia,
--Mike


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ed83e93973899f647c9725b8deb6b...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to