On Nov 29, 2007 11:28 PM, Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My 2 cents. I had an opportunity to discuss this very subject with > several people "in the know". It is my understanding that none of the > reasons below were at play. It is my understanding that they wanted the > technology - especially rushmore - and the people. I believe that > rushmore is in SQL Server and possibly other stuff. WE also know that > there are FoxPro people scattered throughout the company and not in > trivial positions. I personally don't believe for a minute that they > wanted to "kill" FoxPro. You can believe what you want, but it really > doesn't make much difference one way or the other. >
I don't know anybody. But I will say that Rushmore is not in SQL Server. Rushmore is an indexing system, and that is not used within SQL. Not now and not 10+ years ago. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
