>>      That approach sure didn't work with VFP/Mac. Back then they made a 
>> business decision to kill
the product, and no sort of reasoned approach had any effect.<<

Different generation of people involved with the product at this time could 
provide different
results. I think the risk of wasting a few hours of my spare time is worth a 
try. I am not asking
them to continue the development of a tool on a completely different platform 
and commit resource
expenses for a long period of time. I am talking about a short effort with 
limited resources and a
huge long term impact to the community. Different all together in my opinion.

Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.

www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 01:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sedna Released ("with this the last Microsoft release 
ofVisualFoxPro")

On Jan 31, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Rick Schummer wrote:

> If we can show the limited list of bugs, the reasons why VFP  
> developers can't use the
> product, and how we are minimizing the impact to Microsoft to fix  
> these, then maybe Microsoft can be
> convinced to deliver SP3.

        That approach sure didn't work with VFP/Mac. Back then they made a  
business decision to kill the product, and no sort of reasoned  
approach had any effect.

        Marketing trumps technical every time.

-- Ed



[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to