On Tuesday 01 April 2008 21:08, Stephen Russell wrote: > > It was not easy to write in those days prior to Leland's $8 spell > > checker. I > > think the then current existence of four active authors (they were not > > collected into the New Testament until much later) would be a > > disincentive for other authors. Can anyone recognize a crowded field? > > -- > > I thought that there were a few versions of the Gospels we know of today as > well as other Gospels that were discounted and not considered part of the > official set of texts. So the leaders of the church took it upon > themselves to set the story straight.
Hi Stephen! Well, if you want to include what is now known as the Apocrypha, yes. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
