Stephen Russell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Stephen Russell wrote: >> >> First explanation: >> >>>>> When you have slight variations of the same story, or the order is >>>>> different >>>>> between one group and another these are what was set straight. The >>>>> catechism defines most of this as being the only rule book out >>>>> there . >> Second explanation: >>> The scrolls were destroyed by the Romans torching a city/library to >>> "out" >>> the Greek influence. >> One is "setting straight", the other is "torching". Hmmm... sure >> sounds like "bend the facts until they fit the assumption". >> > ----------------------------------------------- > > When your asking where docs are there is a reason for a lack there of. > > That doesn't change the setting the consistent version. You are talking > about an oral society.
This argument reminds me sooo much the one about the existence of WMD's in Iraq. You know "if we can't find them is because they hid them so well, and if they went to all that trouble then they were certainly WMD's". I thought your govt was bullshitting but I can now see that it's the way you people think (or whatever it is called what you do). _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
