Bill Arnold wrote:
> <snipped>
> BTW, I didn't mean to imply that Mike Babcock is on board with me on
> this. He's said he's not interested at this time.
>   

Bill - you never asked as far as I recall, I and as such, I never 
answered.  ???  The "Bill" I referred to in my other email was a 
different Bill...not you.




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to