Bill Arnold wrote: > Michael, > > >>> BTW, I didn't mean to imply that Mike Babcock is on board with me on >>> > > >>> this. He's said he's not interested at this time. >>> >>> >> Bill - you never asked as far as I recall, I and as such, I never >> answered. ??? The "Bill" I referred to in my other email was a >> different Bill...not you. >> > > > The exchange I referred to: > > > >> I've got some connections that I'm looking to exploit for activities >> such as telemarketing and basic "level 1" support operations which may >> > > >> also be of interest to you (?) >> >> >> >> >> > > Hi Bill, > > No, at this time I'm not interested. > >
Oh the tele-marketing thing. Yeah, no...no thanks. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
