Ed Leafe wrote: > On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote: > >> Image is what I am talking about. The public face that they put on >> what is "cool." Thug == Cool. > > You are confusing image with actions. Of course the image is cool - > that's why it's popular. Duh! > >> OBTW, no, that is not the same thing as black culture. That was a >> cheap shot at Michael. You usually debate much better. > > > I think that his comment that hockey players are not thugs explains > it all.
No where did I explicitly say that hockey players were not thugs. What they do ON THE ICE (or the court or the football field or at the game) is NOT at issue identifying them as thugs. It's their behavior OFF THE FIELD/COURT that I'm talking about. But then again you're smart enough to deduce that. You must be having an off day. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
