Ed Leafe wrote: <snipped> > There is a large, vocal movement by disgruntled Clinton supporters to > undermine the Obama candidacy. Something had to have been done in some > sort of official capacity to result in such an unprecedented revolt.
Really? I don't think so. Those folks were very passionate about Hillary. To have a mutiny against Obama wouldn't be hard to imagine, given the way it went down in the end with such a close race and the controversy with Florida/Michigan, popular vote vs. delegate vote, media bias, race card playing, etc. I think those folks would have done this without any kind of official doctrine from the HQ of Hillary's camp. > <snipped> Reminds me of the religious > right folks who are supporting the Democrat this year, hoping that in > four years people will be so disgusted with the direction they've > taken the country that the door will be wide open to a resurgent > Huckabee or similar fundamentalist. Really? Sure, there's nuts like that who have that agenda, but I don't think their numbers are going to make a dent on the surface. They're just nuts in the outfield of insignificance. > Perhaps they are reasoning that by > letting McCain bring the country further down the Bush path for the > next 4 years, Clinton will have a better chance in the next election. > Now why do I find that one believable moreso than the others? ;-) Seriously, for anyone to "throw away 4 years" for a candidate they don't like just to better position someone else in 2012 is absolutely ridiculous and irresponsible. But in a country as big as this, yes, sadly, those folks are out there. But are there enough of them to make a difference? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
