<(I do think Obama is *an* anti-Christ, because he lets people give him
glory and fosters a messiah image, and feeds a cult-of-personality mania
that is totally unhealthy in a constitutional republic).>

Let's start with that one. The *an* is a recent addition and while it
deflects some of my criticism let's try being biblically correct. There is
ONE antichrist prophesied in the Bible and comparing anyone - including
Obama - does you no credit. Leave that description out of it and your
credibility already rises dramatically. As for cult-of-personality... I
think you have gotten so used to a universally despised President that the
concept of a wildly popular one disturbs you. 'yes we can' resonated with
the american people who want to believe that 'yes they can' rise about the
morass of economic uncertainly.  Obama is a person who inspires, who leads
and is charismatic. He can work a crowd like few before him. To somehow
describe this as unhealthy is just another example of your lack of
perspective. You describe popularity as a sin. People are NOT worshipping
him. I know what true worship is and this is nothing like it. They love him,
they trust him, they honour him and they hope they will lead them out of the
mess. Its called being popular. It could also be that he is Esther - 'a
person born for such a time as this'.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Bob Calco
Sent: Thursday, 12 February 2009 8:09 AM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Mounting National Debt May Be More Dangerous Than
Terrorists

> 3 weeks into office, blaming Obama is a tad premature. Why do you think
> no
> one takes you seriously? Where's the balanced commentary. Oppose the
> bailout
> if you want, but do it using language and argument that doesn't label
> you as
> nothing more than a 'right wing nutjob'. The 'Obama is the Antichrist'
> argument is one that will doom any of your other arguments to derision.
> If
> you sound like a nutjob and your arguments come from a place that
> persective
> has not yet visited then people will just ignore you. The good points
> you
> make will be ignored along with the rest.

You start from a general principal -- "It's too early to judge anything" --
and ignore already known facts, which I am trying to be diligent to bring to
everyone's attention.

My arguments about the stimulus bill have two separate but equal tracts: An
economic one (it's not about stimulus but totally political in motivation
and implementation, and totally going to fail in every one of its named
goals, not to mention burden several generations with even more crushing
debt) and a spiritual one (I do think Obama is *an* anti-Christ, because he
lets people give him glory and fosters a messiah image, and feeds a
cult-of-personality mania that is totally unhealthy in a constitutional
republic).

I have been severely critical of Bush and McCain and Republicans generally.
I have not spared them any blame, but I do react negatively to the idiotic
argument that what's going on now is somehow the opposite of what these same
people accused Bush of doing -- using fear to rape the Treasury and benefit
lobbyists and friends -- or that everything is Bush's fault, which, as Mike
points out, is also a canard, since Congress controls the purse strings.

The truth is that both parties are to blame, and what is happening now is
nothing short of the greatest theft of wealth of all time. The people Obama
has surrounded himself with are totally corrupt retreads who inspire no
hope.

Obama is not some victim in this situation, which seems to be your view;
indeed he now totally owns what happens next. He asked for the job. He got
it.

And he's already making a mighty botch of his opportunity.

- Bob


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to