You sure can post long but even after the preponderance of words it still
seems like you are seeing what you want to regarding worship of Obama and
your belief that people are treating him like a god. If we exclude the
literally insane and the usual suspects we are left with people that are
excited by him; love him and believe in him (non-spiritual belief). That is
a LONG LONG way from worship. People behave in truly weird and indescribable
ways especially when under stress or when overly excited. Euphoria and
stress can make behaviours look quite strange.

I honestly think you are grossly and unfairly characterizing the reactions
to Obama as worship - ie SPIRITUAL worship by the proper biblical
definition. Who is calling Obama their god? And I mean that unequivocally,
not by some trick of misinterpreting language.

I think you are grossly overreacting

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Bob Calco
Sent: Friday, 13 February 2009 1:10 AM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Mounting National Debt May Be More Dangerous Than
Terrorists

> < I saw a soul in complete bondage to the god of this world>
> 
> You saw exactly what you wanted and expected to see. 

This is exactly what people are doing with Obama. He even writes about this
phenomenon in his book, when he declares himself to be a blank screen on
which people project their hopes and dreams. It's a lot like the passage
about how he learned to fool his mother into thinking he was off drugs
finally, and the general lesson it taught him about disarming people's
fears.

> You choose to
> twist a
> person's words, misinterpret their actions, all to justify the paranoid
> delusions that infect your thinking. When I read this:
> 
> "Meanwhile, he's palpitating, declaring what a blessing the President's
> mere
> holy presence is, oh gracious god thank you, and lifting his hands in
> joy
> and adoration at every phrase that utters forth from his messiah's
> lips."
> 
> It makes me want to vomit. You are paranoid and perhaps genuinely in
> need of
> a little help and counseling.

I wonder why you have such a reaction. I was just describing what the guy
did and trying to counter your point that it wasn't some kind of worship. 

>
> And I repeat my statement that despite your obvious learning, you are
> not
> seeing clearly.

So, he wasn't breathing irregularly? He wasn't raising his hands, waiving
his cap, continually throughout his dialog with Obama in joy and thanks? He
didn't say "it's such a blessing to see you" or "oh gracious god thank
you!"? These gestures are normal and mean nothing in particular? 

More to the point. He didn't ask the President of the United States what he
was going to do to see to it a guy like him, who worked for McDonalds for
four and a half years, would get "better" benefits (whatever he meant by
that)? He wasn't basically praying to someone who represents a kind of god
to him for something on the order of direct intervention in his life, with
which he was fundamentally dissatisfied, despite having a steady job and
being in school studying to fulfill a dream to become a disc jockey? 

In other words, he wasn't grateful for his blessings and opportunities, but
rather he was expecting---no, demanding---more, and totally convinced his
only way to get that was through oh gracious god thank you mr.
president---is this not true? Was he not angry, with his hand in an
aggressive posture, as he described his horrible job "situation"? Is he not
only 19? Is it not unreasonable for him to be so angry and ungrateful to
have a steady job with some benefits and an education opportunity? Was it a
healthy spiritual attitude he was expressing?

Is it spiritually healthy and right to have so many blessings and yet feel
wronged and entitled to more? It's OK to bow before a man like that?

When I saw him do those things, prostrating himself before the "powers and
principalities of this world," fundamentally ungrateful and demanding more,
more, more, that made me want to vomit. 

You refuse to see the powers behind Obama for what they are: spirits of
wrath, envy, and entitlement. 

Obama's actions since becoming president do not belie hope over fear, but
quite the opposite. "But it's only a few weeks in, give the man a chance,
jeez" is not an argument---it's willful blindness to the facts. He's broken
a great many of his promises already about ethics, lobbyists, FISA,
gratuitous pork spending---but no matter, after all, all politicians do
that, move alone, thou shall not call Obama out on his broken promises, la
la la, we won't listen---and moving at an incredible pace to change so much
so fast, not to make America better, but to solidify Democrat control of the
government. 

No president before has made the census answerable to a partisan political
operative---Bush didn't even do this with Rove. But Emmanuel, well known for
his potty mouth and ruthless partisan tactics, is now the answer man for the
census director, not the commerce secretary. He's hired a professional dirt
digger with no legal qualifications to be the chief legal research director
of the White House. How does that comport with his image as post partisan?

The list of what he's actually, concretely done in the last three weeks is
comparatively HUGE. His tactics to sell the "stimulus" are rooted in fear,
panic, and pending doom, when in fact the very thing he's promoting is what
is going to bring about prolonged pain and suffering---and not
coincidentally he and his party needs both to have and hold power.

I wonder about the source of this power, then I see a guy like Julio, or a
woman like Henrietta, and it becomes obvious that this power is not of God. 

I want to be clear on the following points, since you seem all too eager to
jump to conclusions about me just because my writing style can be a bit,
shall we say, atavistic:

1. I don't "judge" Julio in the sense that "judging" as it is meant in the
scripture "Judge not, lest ye be judged". I'm trying to discern the spirit
behind his behavior, and the spirit behind Obama's power. Actually my heart
breaks for him, because he is indeed spiritually bound (it's easy to mistake
his gestures for being those of a pothead, but I doubt he can afford to buy
pot), and it's evident by all of his words and behavior that he worships
Obama. His facebook page is all about Obama, and he was wearing the image of
Obama on his shirt. You however are eager to judge me---a phoney Christian,
a fool, delusional, in need of psychiatric help, etc. Why do you personalize
this so? I don't say anything of the sort to or about you, no matter how
much I disagree with you about Obama.

2. I do think it's totally fair to discern spirits, which is often mistaken
for being judgmental---indeed we have a scriptural mandate to test them and
see if they are of God. Obama is the first politician to come around that
raised my spiritual antennae in such a profoundly negative way. Why? Well
first it was the way crowds around him acted. The feinting, the
spontaneously huge gatherings. For what? His rhetoric is always vague and
indecipherable (by design), but he has charisma, as you noted, at least when
he's in front of a teleprompter. (His extemporaneous efforts are nowhere
near as impressive, and usually come across as unfocused and long-winded.)
But there is something else. The more I learned about him---his past, his
books, his various statements over time---the less this figure of hope
looked like hope, and the more he looked like doom, despair, anger, hate. He
feeds on these things to derive his power like no one I've ever seen before.
And he makes everyone feel so damn good about harboring those feelings and
turning them to the works of man.

I have listed a great many *facts* about his life that neither add up nor,
taken in isolation, fit the image of the guy. All this people seem willing
to look past for the sake of some "hope" that is a pure media production and
has no basis in who the guy is, what he actually does, or what the people
around him are actually like.

Your insistence that we need to see what he will do before we come to any
conclusions is nonsense to me. He has already done much, he has a history
and a past that is knowable, and none of it meshes with the image of the guy
that has been manufactured. It's not partly out of whack, or a little out of
sorts, but totally out of phase.

3. Our fight, as it says in Ephesians, is not with flesh and blood, but with
the powers and principalities of this world. So I'm not picking on Julio to
pick on Julio---I am singling him out as a type of person who gives glory
and power to these principalities. 

If after all this you are still going to sit back like some Ed or Helio
groupie and accuse me of being insane, just so you can feel spiritually and
intellectually superior, then I shall bother you no more.

- Bob




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to